Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Buenas tardes, tengo dos dudas
1. Si en mi testamento exclui a mi pareja vivimos juntos hace casi 5 años, él puede impugnar el testamento a mi muerte?
2. Qué derechos tenemos como concubinos, al momento de separarnos, si no existen hijos de por medio.
Tengo entendido que con las nuevas leyes puede él pedirme una indemnización por pérdida de tiempo y que a los 5 años de concubinato ambos tenemos derechos y obligaciones.
Muchas gracias.
Estará al frente del cargo por un periodo de 15 años, a partir de este 14 de diciembre. La presidenta de la Mesa Directiva del Senado, Ana Lilia Rivera Rivera, le tomó la protesta constitucional a Lenia Batres Guadarrama, para ...
El recorte de 15.280 millones de pesos a estos instrumentos financieros ha provocado un nuevo choque con la Suprema Corte. Un 62% de encuestados tiene “poco o nada” de confianza en el máximo tribunal Trabajadores del poder judicial se manifiestan ...
Con el riesgo de caer en la falacia de generalización, puede distinguirse la labor legislativa de la jurisdiccional, a partir de considerar que la primera tiene como norte el criterio político; mientras que la segunda toma como guía el aspecto ...
You are correct that both are understandable.
The only other possible everyday meaning I could think of would be ‘I see him [in my mind’s eye] last night’; that is, I am, at this very moment, imagining him last night. But it should almost always be clear from context which one is intended.
‘Correct’ doesn’t mean ‘understandable’, though. If I say ‘Me want have fooding’ it’s pretty clear what to understand from that, but it’s not anywhere near correct Standard English grammar. If you lived somewhere where you spoke a dialect of English in which this was acceptable grammar, however, then it would be correct for that dialect.
No, ‘I see him last night’ is always incorrect and will be only just barely understandable. It is a very serious and basic error, and it will be tiring for a native speaker to converse with someone who speaks like this, because they will constantly have to be remembering what the person really means. It will not be ‘immediately obvious without thinking about it’.
Someone just asked this question recently, and I replied, saying that ‘I see him last night’ is never correct. That is exactly what i meant.
Debes tener gran caracter y mucha paciencia y sobre todo ganas muchas
Yes, I understand it. I hear a lot of this incorrect grammar from my wife. I would expect that the person that spoke this was possibly Chinese. In Chinese there are no tenses or plurals. No he or she pronouns. The context tells all. So it might have been a direct translation from Chinese.
There is a certain poetic sense in which “I see” works. “I see him last night in my dreams” although not technically correct. However, generally speaking “I saw” is the right usage for past events. Much prose writing in English novels is in the present tense although they are about past events. The author superimposes himself however on the situation as if it were the present.